siggy anyone?

Weed doesn't have "natural" addicts like alcohol and tobacco do so weed does not make you physically addicted, it can make you physiologically addicted though. But one every 3 weeks is nothing, people in my last school smoked like every 4-5 hours. Weed is also does less physical damage than others socially accepted drugs like alcohol and tobacco. If anyone is wondering, I don't drink/smoke and don't plan to do it ever.

Metawe wrote:

Weed doesn't have "natural" addicts like alcohol and tobacco do so weed does not make you physically addicted, it can make you physiologically addicted though. But one every 3 weeks is nothing, people in my last school smoked like every 4-5 hours.

o.o'' I would die from inhaling that much smoke... what school do you go to?! :P

Before wrote:

Metawe wrote:

Weed doesn't have "natural" addicts like alcohol and tobacco do so weed does not make you physically addicted, it can make you physiologically addicted though. But one every 3 weeks is nothing, people in my last school smoked like every 4-5 hours.

o.o'' I would die from inhaling that much smoke... what school do you go to?! :P

see ! im not an addict !
meta said it and hes smarter than you !
F5

Before wrote:

Metawe wrote:

Weed doesn't have "natural" addicts like alcohol and tobacco do so weed does not make you physically addicted, it can make you physiologically addicted though. But one every 3 weeks is nothing, people in my last school smoked like every 4-5 hours.

o.o'' I would die from inhaling that much smoke... what school do you go to?! :P

o.o That was a fast response, I added a little more stuff. I used to go to Templeton... doubt you know where it is. The east side of Vancouver is the "worst" one by the way.

He never said that. He just knows more than me. >.>

You can't measure intelligence, you can measure knowledge and people base intelligence off knowledge. They're different things...

Metawe wrote:

You can't measure intelligence, you can measure knowledge and people base intelligence off knowledge. They're different things...

So.. you mean like IQ tests don't really test your IQ? o.o''

Before wrote:

Metawe wrote:

You can't measure intelligence, you can measure knowledge and people base intelligence off knowledge. They're different things...

So.. you mean like IQ tests don't really test your IQ? o.o''

They measure your current IQ, in teenagers and especially pre-teenagers, the brain continues to improve until adolescence is over which varies per person. And I'm sure you will be smarter than me when you get older.

Metawe wrote:

They measure your current IQ, in teenagers and especially pre-teenagers, the brain continues to improve until adolescence is over which varies per person. And I'm sure you will be smarter than me when you get older.

That's nice to know. :D
I thought IQ tests only help in certain things. :P

i nid myfantasy's character to do a siggy.

finalstoryfreak wrote:

i nid myfantasy's character to do a siggy.

I can do a siggy, but I am way too lazy right now. :P
NO SCHOOL! WOOT! :D

finalstoryfreak wrote:

i nid myfantasy's character to do a siggy.

Use the one that is following Zeru in his signature.

also an iq tests only measures your book smartness
not if you can anticipate thing well, and other things like that
i see people in my school doing a hegher lv of education
and they are realy idiotic when it comes to doing normal stuff
like building a paper plain or something
they over think and only know what they read/learn
so you can be smart even if you fail at an iq test.

shadowfluxx wrote:

also an iq tests only measures your book smartness
not if you can anticipate thing well, and other things like that
i see people in my school doing a hegher lv of education
and they are realy idiotic when it comes to doing normal stuff
like building a paper plain or something
they over think and only know what they read/learn
so you can be smart even if you fail at an iq test.

Actually that would mean they have a good memory since they can memorize stuff easily, most teacher even now focus on stuff like that. There are also some people that can just do complicated stuff easily but struggle when it comes to simple things since they might automatically think that it needs something more. I can just build one type of paper plane o.o. I also believe there are multiple intelligences and society in general still only accepts a few of them by combining them and that makes a person "smart". I have no idea how the IQ test works or what is IQ itself ... I have to read it about it later.

an IQ test, is based on every aspect of what you should have learned at school.
but i agree that there are different sorts of intelegence.
but if you combine than you get one smart person,...
could be true but i dont think those people are that commen in the world
and an IQ is based on what you should be able to learn on school as said above
and sientists already proven that you haven an SQ wich is spiritual Q.(something lol)
anyway, at school i had to do a SQ test once, and the teacher said there was a
connection between ur IQ and your SQ and i went like , ye if your SQ is high your IQ is low
since i dont belive in all that spiritual mumbo jumbo,...
andway i scored like 64,.....
but im deffenatly not retarded, so i dont think it has any connection with your IQ
but having knowledge on every aspect of what you can learn, and be able to anticipate, communicate and think free minded without going to pshycologicly thinking that is what makes a person smart, in my opinion.

shadowfluxx wrote:

an IQ test, is based on every aspect of what you should have learned at school.
but i agree that there are different sorts of intelegence.
but if you combine than you get one smart person,...
could be true but i dont think those people are that commen in the world
and an IQ is based on what you should be able to learn on school as said above
and sientists already proven that you haven an SQ wich is spiritual Q.(something lol)
anyway, at school i had to do a SQ test once, and the teacher said there was a
connection between ur IQ and your SQ and i went like , ye if your SQ is high your IQ is low
since i dont belive in all that spiritual mumbo jumbo,...
andway i scored like 64,.....
but im deffenatly not retarded, so i dont think it has any connection with your IQ
but having knowledge on every aspect of what you can learn, and be able to anticipate, communicate and think free minded without going to pshycologicly thinking that is what makes a person smart, in my opinion.

What the hell are you talking about?
An IQ test isn't about stuff you learn at school, it's about stuff like making pairs, solving some kind of puzzles and stuff, I've done the beginning of it. There are no relations to subjects at all. As for the SQ that's an utter lie, scientists will never approve something of that sort, maybe that teacher believed in karma, spiritual forces, aura and all that stuff? If I ever get to make that "test" I'll get around a 0 or so...

Knowing every aspect of various things doesn't seem useful to me since it is much better to specialize in two or three things. Sure, it might be interesting to learn about various subjects but in the end, it won't help you at all since we don't have long lives. Anticipating is just looking at patterns or things you have seen/learned/heard of before, in my opinion, it doesn't involve that much of thinking as contrary to problem solving. Communicating is not an intelligence, it is just a skill. So are you saying that shy people are dumb? Usually they are the most intelligent but lack social skills, it is not just a stereotype, I have friends that are like that and myself are a little shier than most people. Expressing yourself with words is an intelligence, not necessarily talking. I know I lack that intelligence since I cannot express what I feel or what I don't feel. People who get psychological help aren't retarded or stupid, they are just emotionally unstable for any reason, it can be something as small as breaking up with someone or something bigger like being abused by your relatives.

The Wikipedia article about SQ doesn't explain much, it just shows how undeveloped and false that is... "Tension Free Life, Self awareness, Free from alcohol and other drugs, Support of society , Less depression, Self Confidence." are the qualities of SQ, they just seem related to how your personality and past is, nothing to be associated with spiritual things.

Metawe wrote:

shadowfluxx wrote:

an IQ test, is based on every aspect of what you should have learned at school.
but i agree that there are different sorts of intelegence.
but if you combine than you get one smart person,...
could be true but i dont think those people are that commen in the world
and an IQ is based on what you should be able to learn on school as said above
and sientists already proven that you haven an SQ wich is spiritual Q.(something lol)
anyway, at school i had to do a SQ test once, and the teacher said there was a
connection between ur IQ and your SQ and i went like , ye if your SQ is high your IQ is low
since i dont belive in all that spiritual mumbo jumbo,...
andway i scored like 64,.....
but im deffenatly not retarded, so i dont think it has any connection with your IQ
but having knowledge on every aspect of what you can learn, and be able to anticipate, communicate and think free minded without going to pshycologicly thinking that is what makes a person smart, in my opinion.

What the hell are you talking about?
An IQ test isn't about stuff you learn at school, it's about stuff like making pairs, solving some kind of puzzles and stuff, I've done the beginning of it. There are no relations to subjects at all. As for the SQ that's an utter lie, scientists will never approve something of that sort, maybe that teacher believed in karma, spiritual forces, aura and all that stuff? If I ever get to make that "test" I'll get around a 0 or so...

Knowing every aspect of various things doesn't seem useful to me since it is much better to specialize in two or three things. Sure, it might be interesting to learn about various subjects but in the end, it won't help you at all since we don't have long lives. Anticipating is just looking at patterns or things you have seen/learned/heard of before, in my opinion, it doesn't involve that much of thinking as contrary to problem solving. Communicating is not an intelligence, it is just a skill. So are you saying that shy people are dumb? Usually they are the most intelligent but lack social skills, it is not just a stereotype, I have friends that are like that and myself are a little shier than most people. Expressing yourself with words is an intelligence, not necessarily talking. I know I lack that intelligence since I cannot express what I feel or what I don't feel. People who get psychological help aren't retarded or stupid, they are just emotionally unstable for any reason, it can be something as small as breaking up with someone or something bigger like being abused by your relatives.

The Wikipedia article about SQ doesn't explain much, it just shows how undeveloped and false that is... "Tension Free Life, Self awareness, Free from alcohol and other drugs, Support of society , Less depression, Self Confidence." are the qualities of SQ, they just seem related to how your personality and past is, nothing to be associated with spiritual things.

dude i dont care if you belive me or not, but dont start saying im lieing,
i made an sq test on school so i know what its about.
and if you specialise in something is easyer to learn than knowing alot about all different subjects
i think your realy smart if you know alot about everything, and still are capable to live a normal live.
like you said most smart people have less social skills, but fi you have both, than i think your smart.
and dont tell me yuo belive what is writen on wikipedia, everyone can just edit that page and write complete
rubish. about the iq test, i might be making puzles but that is logic thinking, and you do learn that at school.
and besides thats just one subject of an iq test, i done a few and they have different subjects every few questions.
going from math, to puzzles and languishes. but if your real smart you have every skill that there can be learned or born with,...
and im not saying that if you just miss one skill your an idiot, like you said someone can be smart without being able to socialise,..
but to me that does mean you arent perfect, and i know nowone is perfect, but as a human you need something to call perfect
and strive towards it.

heres is an example of what im trying to explain

i knwo this is an completely idiotic math fail.
but if you look close you see that the one wich gave the anser got 0,5 point for it.
and i agree on that, even though she didnt gave the anser that should be give.
it could be true what that person wrote. (not sure if it is im not a girl)

the point is, you can anser questions about a different subject, like anatomy is this case
if you know enough about another subject. but if you know both ansers you can compare them
and create an anser that is perfect. and that is what being smart to me means.
looking beyond the obvious anser.

(and if your not getting what im trying to say just tell me,
i learned in the past that im not that good in explaining what i mean or think.)

o.o... You went off topic for like.. about 1 and a half pages. :P
Anyway, I am thinking of making a siggy, but my hands went numb from playing snow with my friends and this tall dude with his girlfriend today. o.o''
So.. I have a question:

What programs did you use to make a siggy?

shadowfluxx wrote:

Metawe wrote:

shadowfluxx wrote:

an IQ test, is based on every aspect of what you should have learned at school.
but i agree that there are different sorts of intelegence.
but if you combine than you get one smart person,...
could be true but i dont think those people are that commen in the world
and an IQ is based on what you should be able to learn on school as said above
and sientists already proven that you haven an SQ wich is spiritual Q.(something lol)
anyway, at school i had to do a SQ test once, and the teacher said there was a
connection between ur IQ and your SQ and i went like , ye if your SQ is high your IQ is low
since i dont belive in all that spiritual mumbo jumbo,...
andway i scored like 64,.....
but im deffenatly not retarded, so i dont think it has any connection with your IQ
but having knowledge on every aspect of what you can learn, and be able to anticipate, communicate and think free minded without going to pshycologicly thinking that is what makes a person smart, in my opinion.

What the hell are you talking about?
An IQ test isn't about stuff you learn at school, it's about stuff like making pairs, solving some kind of puzzles and stuff, I've done the beginning of it. There are no relations to subjects at all. As for the SQ that's an utter lie, scientists will never approve something of that sort, maybe that teacher believed in karma, spiritual forces, aura and all that stuff? If I ever get to make that "test" I'll get around a 0 or so...

Knowing every aspect of various things doesn't seem useful to me since it is much better to specialize in two or three things. Sure, it might be interesting to learn about various subjects but in the end, it won't help you at all since we don't have long lives. Anticipating is just looking at patterns or things you have seen/learned/heard of before, in my opinion, it doesn't involve that much of thinking as contrary to problem solving. Communicating is not an intelligence, it is just a skill. So are you saying that shy people are dumb? Usually they are the most intelligent but lack social skills, it is not just a stereotype, I have friends that are like that and myself are a little shier than most people. Expressing yourself with words is an intelligence, not necessarily talking. I know I lack that intelligence since I cannot express what I feel or what I don't feel. People who get psychological help aren't retarded or stupid, they are just emotionally unstable for any reason, it can be something as small as breaking up with someone or something bigger like being abused by your relatives.

The Wikipedia article about SQ doesn't explain much, it just shows how undeveloped and false that is... "Tension Free Life, Self awareness, Free from alcohol and other drugs, Support of society , Less depression, Self Confidence." are the qualities of SQ, they just seem related to how your personality and past is, nothing to be associated with spiritual things.

dude i dont care if you belive me or not, but dont start saying im lieing,
i made an sq test on school so i know what its about.
and if you specialise in something is easyer to learn than knowing alot about all different subjects
i think your realy smart if you know alot about everything, and still are capable to live a normal live.
like you said most smart people have less social skills, but fi you have both, than i think your smart.
and dont tell me yuo belive what is writen on wikipedia, everyone can just edit that page and write complete
rubish. about the iq test, i might be making puzles but that is logic thinking, and you do learn that at school.
and besides thats just one subject of an iq test, i done a few and they have different subjects every few questions.
going from math, to puzzles and languishes. but if your real smart you have every skill that there can be learned or born with,...
and im not saying that if you just miss one skill your an idiot, like you said someone can be smart without being able to socialise,..
but to me that does mean you arent perfect, and i know nowone is perfect, but as a human you need something to call perfect
and strive towards it.

heres is an example of what im trying to explain

i knwo this is an completely idiotic math fail.
but if you look close you see that the one wich gave the anser got 0,5 point for it.
and i agree on that, even though she didnt gave the anser that should be give.
it could be true what that person wrote. (not sure if it is im not a girl)

the point is, you can anser questions about a different subject, like anatomy is this case
if you know enough about another subject. but if you know both ansers you can compare them
and create an anser that is perfect. and that is what being smart to me means.
looking beyond the obvious anser.

(and if your not getting what im trying to say just tell me,
i learned in the past that im not that good in explaining what i mean or think.)

I'm not saying you're lying, I'm saying your teacher is lying. Sure people say Wikipedia isn't reliable yet it is the most visited information site and as I've said before, I don't trust Wikipedia, I trust its sources. Plus, if you edit something with wrong information (you can try right now if you wish) it will be edited within 10 minutes.

And no, I did not say most smart people lack social skills, I say that some do. What I said was that most shy people are actually smart, those are different things. By subject, I meant school subjects (like socials, science, etc). The most accepted IQ test is the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale which measures all intelligences, diagram here:

Spoiler:

No one is born smart, you get smart and reach your limit by either, mental capacity or simply because of your age. If a human is "born" smart but is taught nothing, it will take another few thousands of years for his/her civilization to catch up with ours, it might even have a different outcome. I don't get your actual point about being smart but not having social skills.

But I do agree with your other point about knowing two things, combining them and making a better answer, not perfect, just better. For it to be perfect you would have to know everything about it, meaning you have to know everything because one thing relates to another and to understand that "another" you need to know what's related to it and so on. That's why I say that it is better to just specialize in two-three things related to what you plan to do as your job since we as humans have short lives and not enough freedom or "free-time" because of how society is consisted and exists.

Seriously Meta, smaller quote chain? :P

Is this topic even on topic??
I don't wanna know why your talking about
teachers and school o-o.
Anyways if the person who makes the siggys care
in your signatures there are some pixels around the characters
and skills.

myfantasy wrote:

Is this topic even on topic??
I don't wanna know why your talking about
teachers and school o-o.
Anyways if the person who makes the siggys care
in your signatures there are some pixels around the characters
and skills.

Yeah, I think that happens when you use paint... It happens to me. :P
You gotta ask finalstoryfreak or was it Blaze? I forgot who made it. :D

Edit: It was Finalstoryfreak. :P

ye alright me and meta got a bit caried away, to bad he doesnt get warning poitns for it and i do
F5

shadowfluxx wrote:

ye alright me and meta got a bit caried away, to bad he doesnt get warning poitns for it and i do
F5

o.o'' I see him glaring at you now.

Before wrote:

shadowfluxx wrote:

ye alright me and meta got a bit caried away, to bad he doesnt get warning poitns for it and i do
F5

o.o'' I see him glaring at you now.

shut it
ill glare at you !
*glares*