How to run FinalStory on Mac

Alright I have recently discovered that you can run windows executables on mac ;D
http://www.davidbaumgold.com/tutorials/wine-mac/
Follow that instruction to install wine Then after that, just run final story! ;D
Sticky pl0x?

Why don't you just sum up what it says on the page
that would be much more helpful for people o-o
and because some people are idiots

LOL DARREN...

Anyways, you could always install windows on mac...

Yeah, but some people like their macs.

Shadow wrote:

Yeah, but some people like their overpriced, unstable, and extremely basic operating system with idiot-friendly UI.

Fix'd

Get a Linux, people.
Sure, Macs are nice and pretty, but those things are EXPENSIVE and really can't do much.
Windows - Intended for the common people, with options ranging from wide company usage (XP Pro, Server 2010) to everyday home use, and can be idiot-friendly at first, (ESPECIALLY IN HOME VERSIONS OF THE OS'S) but so long as you know what you're doing, you can do quite a bit with it.

Linux - Intended for those who want absolute stability. Everything is saved in files-- no kernels, no nothing. Has a great shell input, and is widely popular for server administration/exchange servers due to the stability. The downside is that the UI may not be very idiot-friendly, but it's very good at doing what it does.

Macs - Intended as a status symbol for people with too much money. Looks great, functions.....well, they censor swear words on the forums. I rest my case. F3

Rant aside, I concur with Darren. You don't know how many people are too lazy to READ and DIGEST! If you understand what it says, paraphrase it on here.

NeoFrost wrote:

Shadow wrote:

Yeah, but some people like their overpriced, unstable, and extremely basic operating system with idiot-friendly UI.

Fix'd

Get a Linux, people.
Sure, Macs are nice and pretty, but those things are EXPENSIVE and really can't do much.
Windows - Intended for the common people, with options ranging from wide company usage (XP Pro, Server 2010) to everyday home use, and can be idiot-friendly at first, (ESPECIALLY IN HOME VERSIONS OF THE OS'S) but so long as you know what you're doing, you can do quite a bit with it.

Linux - Intended for those who want absolute stability. Everything is saved in files-- no kernels, no nothing. Has a great shell input, and is widely popular for server administration/exchange servers due to the stability. The downside is that the UI may not be very idiot-friendly, but it's very good at doing what it does.

Macs - Intended as a status symbol for people with too much money. Looks great, functions.....well, they censor swear words on the forums. I rest my case. F3

Rant aside, I concur with Darren. You don't know how many people are too lazy to READ and DIGEST! If you understand what it says, paraphrase it on here.

Linux is pretty good, but I seem to like Windows more... although I do get annoyed about the registry getting clogged up...

NeoFrost wrote:

Shadow wrote:

Yeah, but some people like their overpriced, unstable, and extremely basic operating system with idiot-friendly UI.

Fix'd

Get a Linux, people.
Sure, Macs are nice and pretty, but those things are EXPENSIVE and really can't do much.
Windows - Intended for the common people, with options ranging from wide company usage (XP Pro, Server 2010) to everyday home use, and can be idiot-friendly at first, (ESPECIALLY IN HOME VERSIONS OF THE OS'S) but so long as you know what you're doing, you can do quite a bit with it.

Linux - Intended for those who want absolute stability. Everything is saved in files-- no kernels, no nothing. Has a great shell input, and is widely popular for server administration/exchange servers due to the stability. The downside is that the UI may not be very idiot-friendly, but it's very good at doing what it does.

Macs - Intended as a status symbol for people with too much money. Looks great, functions.....well, they censor swear words on the forums. I rest my case. F3

Rant aside, I concur with Darren. You don't know how many people are too lazy to READ and DIGEST! If you understand what it says, paraphrase it on here.

But most people can't use PORTAL 2 on Linux D:

I heard Portal 2 is fun, I kinda want to play it...

buy it then o-o

NeoFrost wrote:

Shadow wrote:

Yeah, but some people like their overpriced, unstable, and extremely basic operating system with idiot-friendly UI.

Fix'd

Sure, Macs are nice and pretty, but those things are EXPENSIVE and really can't do much.

Windows - Intended for the common people, with options ranging from wide company usage (XP Pro, Server 2010) to everyday home use, and can be idiot-friendly at first, (ESPECIALLY IN HOME VERSIONS OF THE OS'S) but so long as you know what you're doing, you can do quite a bit with it.

Macs - Intended as a status symbol for people with too much money. Looks great, functions.....well, they censor swear words on the forums. I rest my case. F3

Rant aside, I concur with Darren. You don't know how many people are too lazy to READ and DIGEST! If you understand what it says, paraphrase it on here.

For some unknowable reason, i second this.
F3

detergeant2 wrote:

NeoFrost wrote:

Shadow wrote:

Yeah, but some people like their overpriced, unstable, and extremely basic operating system with idiot-friendly UI.

Fix'd

Sure, Macs are nice and pretty, but those things are EXPENSIVE and really can't do much.

Windows - Intended for the common people, with options ranging from wide company usage (XP Pro, Server 2010) to everyday home use, and can be idiot-friendly at first, (ESPECIALLY IN HOME VERSIONS OF THE OS'S) but so long as you know what you're doing, you can do quite a bit with it.

Macs - Intended as a status symbol for people with too much money. Looks great, functions.....well, they censor swear words on the forums. I rest my case. F3

Rant aside, I concur with Darren. You don't know how many people are too lazy to READ and DIGEST! If you understand what it says, paraphrase it on here.

For some unknowable reason, i second this.
F3

Yeah, but they're pretty! :D
Shiny... 8)

Shadow wrote:

detergeant2 wrote:

NeoFrost wrote:

Shadow wrote:

Yeah, but some people like their overpriced, unstable, and extremely basic operating system with idiot-friendly UI.

Fix'd

Sure, Macs are nice and pretty, but those things are EXPENSIVE and really can't do much.

Windows - Intended for the common people, with options ranging from wide company usage (XP Pro, Server 2010) to everyday home use, and can be idiot-friendly at first, (ESPECIALLY IN HOME VERSIONS OF THE OS'S) but so long as you know what you're doing, you can do quite a bit with it.

Macs - Intended as a status symbol for people with too much money. Looks great, functions.....well, they censor swear words on the forums. I rest my case. F3

Rant aside, I concur with Darren. You don't know how many people are too lazy to READ and DIGEST! If you understand what it says, paraphrase it on here.

For some unknowable reason, i second this.
F3

Yeah, but they're pretty! :D
Shiny... 8)

Are you saying they are pretty, shiny, both, or pretty shiny? And I don't use a computer for how "shiny" it is, I use it for how efficient and user friendly it is. If I can get the job done on a... 1000$ computer, should I get a... 2000$ computer just for looks? Lol Macs are ok i guess but windows are still my favorite.